A New Therapeutic Strategy: Eliminating Senescent Cells to Prevent Recurrence in Glioblastoma
We have often emphasized how radiotherapy, despite being a fundamental tool in the treatment of glioblastoma, represents a double-edged sword. The use of ionizing radiation is effective in destroying tumor cells, but can also induce senescence in some of them. These senescent cells, although not proliferating, release molecules that can stimulate the growth of nearby tumor cells, thus promoting recurrence. Recurrences represent one of the main causes of the unfavorable prognosis associated with glioblastoma.
Recent research conducted by the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio has explored an innovative approach to address this problem. Scientists have found that using a new class of experimental drugs, known as “senolytics,” after radiation therapy can selectively eliminate senescent cells without harming normal cells. This could delay or even prevent tumor recurrence. These findings support the idea of a two-step treatment approach: first, inducing senescence in the tumor with radiation therapy or other agents; then, eliminating the senescent cells using senolytics.
Glioblastoma is known for its aggressiveness and high tendency to recur after standard treatments, including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The presence of senescent cells in the tumor microenvironment has been associated with inflammatory processes and the secretion of growth factors that can stimulate the proliferation of residual tumor cells. Thus, the accumulation of senescent cells induced by radiotherapy could, paradoxically, create a fertile ground for tumor recurrence.
Senolytics are an emerging class of drugs designed to selectively eliminate senescent cells. In this study, the application of senolytics after radiotherapy showed promising results in preventing glioblastoma regrowth in preclinical models. These drugs act by inhibiting specific survival pathways of senescent cells, inducing their programmed death and thus reducing the risk of tumor recurrence.
This strategy could offer a solution to prevent recurrence, thus improving the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma. However, it is important to emphasize that, although these results are promising, they are still preliminary. Further clinical studies will be needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach in the therapeutic context.
The introduction of senolytics in the treatment of glioblastoma represents an exciting prospect in the fight against this tumor. By eliminating senescent cells induced by radiotherapy, it may be possible to significantly reduce the risk of relapses, improving survival and quality of life of patients. We will continue to follow closely the developments in this field and keep you updated on new therapeutic perspectives emerging from scientific research, trusting in a rapid transition to the clinical trial phase.
Wonderful information. My twin sister has glioblastoma and currently it has reappeared again. Her husband and I are currently doing research on this deadly monster!
Hi Joan,
My brother (59yrs) has Glioblastoma too, it is multi-focal ‘wild-type’ according to pathology reports. He had a 95% resection in February and radiotherapy & chemo in tandem (low dose). Due to start high dose pulsed chemo which is the Standard of care here in UK. Looking into private DCVax-L on Thursday at a private hospital in London. Nothing is working as a very recent scan following vision issue has show another 2cm tumour growth in a different area of his brain despite being on the above treatment which has grown in the last 10 weeks.
Good luck to your family especially your sister. I feel your pain as we too are desperately searching for help to fight this monster. Sam
My 61 year old brother is newly diagnosed and has been given an extremely dire prognosis. The only treatment they are offering is 6 weeks of radiation. They said it would prolong his life for up to a year. I do not want to accept this prognosis. Please, can anyone give us guidance on where to go for treatment. We are in Boston, MA at one of the best cancer centers in the United States but they are not offering us any hope.
Marian Voros